Logo Background RSS

» Crude or Prudes?

  • What a Problem to Have, Man!
    By controversies on August 16th, 2008 | No Comments Comments

    “Just because Europe’s classical statues had small penises,” argued Mark Wignall, an Observer columnist, “does not mean Jamaica must follow suit.” So, I guess you have figured where this is going. Two naked 7ft high bronzes (Redemption Song) erected in Jamaica’s Emancipation Park have caused a debate in Kingston like no other. The main grievance is that the male statue is a tad too well endowed, which only ever seems to be a problem when related to a statue. The issue as I can figure, is that the statues are supposed to symbolize liberation in an independent Jamaica. Well you can’t get more liberated than that can you ?
    And, thanks in part to Beyonce, the locals are a bit miffed that the statues appear to be too light skinned. For a country who prides itself on being laid back this public art has stirred a great deal of emotion. Remember the poor Bob Marley statue that had to be removed because it didn’t look life like enough!
    At any rate the media are having a field day with it, one journo going so far as describing the sculpture as “a rape of our democracy”.

    But don’t feel too sorry for the sculptor though, Laura Facey Cooper is use to criticism. A little while back she got herself in a little trouble when she created a near-naked and well-endowed carving of Christ. And on the question of too well endowed, Laura’s response is “it is in proportion to the rest of the sculpture. I certainly didn’t overplay it.”

    All I can say is lucky no one has a tin of pink paint! (re: Pretty in Pink article)

  • Pretty in Pink
    By controversies on August 14th, 2008 | No Comments Comments

    What is a Brisbane council to do when a vandal goes and paints the vagina on a woman statue pink? Remove it quick. The poor old council was already under fire for having the controversial statue (which depicts a naked woman lying in a fetal position with her genitals exposed) erected in a park near Brisbane. Antone Bruinsma’s Birth of Venus, which was commissioned by the former Caboolture Shire, was deemed “offensive to women” by the new amalgamated one. So I guess they were rather pleased that someone went and dolloped the privates in bright pink. It wouldn’t be a council member now would it ?
    Evidently attempts to clean the paint off failed. Pity the fool that got that job!So the council made an executive decision to remove the sculpture completely from the park, as they believe it will be a sitting duck for future graffiti artists and vandals. Hmm the artist’s respond to the council throwing naked pink lady into storage “I feel it’s insulting to women to remove a vulva because of somebody’s attitude.”

  • The Ups and Downs of Art !
    By controversies on August 1st, 2008 | No Comments Comments

    When you approve a statue of Jesus (with an erection) to be shown in your art gallery, you are bound to find yourself in some sort of trouble. But I bet the Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art in Gateshead weren’t expecting to find themselves facing six months prison and a £5,000 fine. Hmm that seems the price you have to pay for outraging public decency. The culprit behind this sordid tale is controversial artist Terence Koh, who also included in the exhibition, statues of Mickey Mouse and ET with erections (they seemed to have avoided scrutiny). The main argument in the case seems to be “had the statue been of Muhammad rather than Christ, there would have been a far greater outcry”. I am surprised the artist didn’t include both !

  • Dear God, What Next ?
    By publicartaroundtheworld on August 1st, 2008 | No Comments Comments

    I’ve heard it all now, an art gallery at the Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art in Gateshead is being taken to court because one of their exhibitions displayed a statue of Jesus with an erection. Holy indecency. The main argument in the prosecution is “had the statue been of Mohammad rather than Christ, there would have been a far greater outcry”. I am thinking Yes ( ain’t that right Salman ?). The culprit is controversial artist, Terence Koh, who also included Mickey Mouse and ET with erections in the exhibition (but they escaped the wrath). Hmm the maximum fine for outraging public decency is six months prison and a £5,000 fine. Gee, if that is the case imagine how many sculptors we could get off the streets!

Advertisement